Reconciliation workbench
Compare competing source values per field, review the recommendation and record a human disposition.
Contract specialist · Procurement analyst · Contracting officer
/dashboard/dcc/reconciliationThe system may recommend; an authorized human decides. Phase 1 never writes back to a source system. Tiles: *Mismatch items*, *Open exceptions*, *Contracts impacted*, *Resolved*.
Reconcile a mismatch
1. Pick from the queue
Filter by status. Each item shows field, source A/B values and as-of times.
2. Review the recommendation
Recommended value, source and authority rule with explanation and competing values.
3. Choose a disposition
*Accept Recommended Value*, *Keep Existing Operational Value*, *Request More Evidence*, *Mark Exception* or *Defer*.
4. Second approval if material
High-risk fields route to Approvals for a different authorized person.
| Golden mismatch (CTR-0042) | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| POP end | 2026-10-31 from ECFS executed Mod P0003; CWS and SharePoint still show 2026-09-30. |
| Obligated amount | $17.3M from Funding Tracker corroborated by P0003; CWS shows $16.8M. |
| COR assignment | Megan Thompson per signed COR appointment memo; Funding Tracker unassigned. |
pop_end, obligated_amount, cor_assignment, acceptance_status, ceiling) are excluded from bulk triage; only low-risk/formatting differences are bulk eligible.Related guides
Procurement approvals
The two-person approval queue for material reconciliations.
Multi-source data
Five synthetic source adapters, their health, per-source lineage for CTR-0042 and the data quality queue.
Contract file evidence map
File completeness, canonical evidence, duplicates, missing items and provenance for each artifact requirement.