Acquisition lifecycle workflow templates
Screen 3.4 — define workflow stages, transitions, decision points and external-input paths for each module combination.
PEEK Platform Administrator · PEEK Technical Reviewer
/peek/customers/tenant-a/3-4Workflow templates (catalog type workflow) describe stages, transitions, required role capabilities, evidence and escalation. Each template must remain a reachable human workflow with Core alone, using external-work intake and human handoff where a peer module is absent — no linear purchase of every acquisition module is forced.
3.4 · Acquisition Lifecycle Workflow
Define permitted workflow templates and decision points. Open it at /peek/customers/tenant-a/3-4 (any tenant ID you can access works in place of tenant-a). The primary action is Release workflow template, which requires workflow_catalog.publish.
How 3.4 works
1. Define stages, decisions, role capabilities and external-input paths for each purchased module combination
Screen 3.4 contract
- Fields shown
- Stages, transitions, role requirement, evidence, escalation
- Primary action
- Release workflow template
- Required capability
workflow_catalog.publish- Validation
- Validate reachable human workflow with Core alone, required evidence and supported handoff contract.
- Successful outcome
- Publish a workflow template; agency adoption and official business decisions occur separately.
- Screen states
- Loading; empty; ready; restricted; stale; error; review pending
- Audit event
admin.screen.3.4.action(acceptance testAT-UI-3.4)- Requirements
- R02, R06, R07, R28, R31, R32, R39, R40, SYS02, SYS04, SYS06, SYS10, SYS11, SYS20, SYS23, UI-3.4
Related guides
Handoff and synchronization governance
Screen 3.11 — publish package submission, human acceptance, immutable accepted versions and changed-input review rules.
Module capabilities and dependencies
Screen 1.10 — publish the capability manifest: Core requirements, optional peers, per-feature prerequisites and manual alternatives.
Catalog lifecycle: draft, review, publish
How every “Publish …” screen works: draft, validation, independent technical review bound to the diff hash, then publish.